Courts just allowed AI child sex abuse material because it’s ‘virtual.’ Who do you think it’s trained on?

Call it virtual all you want. Something still had to teach the model what a child looks like.

The recent 7th Circuit opinion permitting in-home possession of AI-generated child sexual abuse material raises many questions regarding the relationship between protected speech and generative AI. While most people would say CSAM of any child — real or virtual — should be illegal, the decision relies on precedent from the 2002 Ashcroft v. Free Speech […]

Read it at Washington Examiner ↗

← Front page